[lcdproc] Not in perl...
Redvers Davies
red@madhouse.org.uk
Fri, 16 Mar 2001 11:52:31 +0000 (GMT)
> C *is* the appropriate choice. It provides the greatest flexibility and
> while it's more difficult to code for, it's also (in the long run) the
> only chance we've got of being portable.
C is the appropriate choice for interfacing with the hardware. For that there
is no doubt. I just objected to someone saying that perl was messy and
slow and insecure what that is just a product of the Matt Wright school of
programming ;)
> Car stereos can't run Perl (usually, the EMPEG is an exception :), but
> you *might* be able to stuff a small proggie written in C into its
> little brain.
C is the most appropriate choice for embedded devices (unless you have a
lot of perl code in the device and use libperl.o)
Red
-----------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank message to
lcdproc-unsubscribe@lists.omnipotent.net